+12
−1
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
There's logic in __rfcomm_dlc_close: rfcomm_dlc_lock(d); d->state = BT_CLOSED; d->state_changed(d, err); rfcomm_dlc_unlock(d); In rfcomm_dev_state_change, it's possible that rfcomm_dev_put try to take the dlc lock, then we will deadlock. Here fixed it by unlock dlc before rfcomm_dev_get in rfcomm_dev_state_change. why not unlock just before rfcomm_dev_put? it's because there's another problem. rfcomm_dev_get/rfcomm_dev_del will take rfcomm_dev_lock, but in rfcomm_dev_add the lock order is : rfcomm_dev_lock --> dlc lock so I unlock dlc before the taken of rfcomm_dev_lock. Actually it's a regression caused by commit 1905f6c7 ("bluetooth : __rfcomm_dlc_close lock fix"), the dlc state_change could be two callbacks : rfcomm_sk_state_change and rfcomm_dev_state_change. I missed the rfcomm_sk_state_change that time. Thanks Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> for the effort in commit 4c8411f8 ("bluetooth: fix locking bug in the rfcomm socket cleanup handling") but he missed the rfcomm_dev_state_change lock issue. Signed-off-by:Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE