+6
−2
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
When trying to set the ICST 307 clock to 25174000 Hz I ran into this arithmetic error: the icst_hz_to_vco() correctly figure out DIVIDE=2, RDW=100 and VDW=99 yielding a frequency of 25174000 Hz out of the VCO. (I replicated the icst_hz() function in a spreadsheet to verify this.) However, when I called icst_hz() on these VCO settings it would instead return 4122709 Hz. This causes an error in the common clock driver for ICST as the common clock framework will call .round_rate() on the clock which will utilize icst_hz_to_vco() followed by icst_hz() suggesting the erroneous frequency, and then the clock gets set to this. The error did not manifest in the old clock framework since this high frequency was only used by the CLCD, which calls clk_set_rate() without first calling clk_round_rate() and since the old clock framework would not call clk_round_rate() before setting the frequency, the correct values propagated into the VCO. After some experimenting I figured out that it was due to a simple arithmetic overflow: the divisor for 24Mhz reference frequency as reference becomes 24000000*2*(99+8)=0x132212400 and the "1" in bit 32 overflows and is lost. But introducing an explicit 64-by-32 bit do_div() and casting the divisor into (u64) we get the right frequency back, and the right frequency gets set. Tested on the ARM Versatile. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com> Signed-off-by:Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE