+11
−2
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Although syslog_seq and log_next_seq stuff are protected by logbuf_lock
spin log, it's not enough. Say we have two processes A and B, and let
syslog_seq = N, while log_next_seq = N + 1, and the two processes both
come to syslog_print at almost the same time. And No matter which
process get the spin lock first, it will increase syslog_seq by one,
then release spin lock; thus later, another process increase syslog_seq
by one again. In this case, syslog_seq is bigger than syslog_next_seq.
And latter, it would make:
wait_event_interruptiable(log_wait, syslog != log_next_seq)
don't wait any more even there is no new write comes. Thus it introduce
a infinite loop reading.
I can easily see this kind of issue by the following steps:
# cat /proc/kmsg # at meantime, I don't kill rsyslog
# So they are the two processes.
# xinit # I added drm.debug=6 in the kernel parameter line,
# so that it will produce lots of message and let that
# issue happen
It's 100% reproducable on my side. And my disk will be filled up by
/var/log/messages in a quite short time.
So, introduce a mutex_lock to stop syslog_seq from going wild just like
what devkmsg_read() does. It does fix this issue as expected.
v2: use mutex_lock_interruptiable() instead (comments from Kay)
Signed-off-by:
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by:
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Acked-By:
Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
Signed-off-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE