+10
−9
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Al Viro pointed out that I broke some acl functionality...
* ACLs could not be fully removed
* posix_acl_chmod would be called while the old ACL was still cached
* new mode propagated to orangefs server before ACL.
... when I tried to make sure that modes that got changed as a
result of ACL-sets would be sent back to the orangefs server.
Not wanting to try and change the code without having some cases to
test it with, I began to hunt for setfacl examples that were expressible
in pure mode. Along the way I found examples like the following
which confused me:
user A had a file (/home/A/asdf) with mode 740
user B was in user A's group
user C was not in user A's group
setfacl -m u:C:rwx /home/A/asdf
The above setfacl caused ls -l /home/A/asdf to show a mode of 770,
making it appear that all users in user A's group now had full access
to /home/A/asdf, however, user B still only had read acces. Madness.
Anywho, I finally found that the above (whacky as it is) appears to
be "posixly on purpose" and explained in acl(5):
If the ACL has an ACL_MASK entry, the group permissions correspond
to the permissions of the ACL_MASK entry.
Signed-off-by:
Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE