Commit 471bd10f authored Aug 19, 2016 by Josh Poimboeuf Committed by Ingo Molnar Aug 24, 2016

ftrace/x86: Implement HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR



Use the more reliable version of ftrace_graph_ret_addr() so we no longer
have to worry about the unwinder getting out of sync with the function
graph ret_stack index, which can happen if the unwinder skips any frames
before calling ftrace_graph_ret_addr().

This fixes this issue (and several others like it):

  $ cat /proc/self/stack
  [<ffffffff810489a2>] save_stack_trace_tsk+0x22/0x40
  [<ffffffff81311a89>] proc_pid_stack+0xb9/0x110
  [<ffffffff813127c4>] proc_single_show+0x54/0x80
  [<ffffffff812be088>] seq_read+0x108/0x3e0
  [<ffffffff812923d7>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x140
  [<ffffffff812929d9>] vfs_read+0x99/0x140
  [<ffffffff81293f28>] SyS_read+0x58/0xc0
  [<ffffffff818af97c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbd
  [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

  $ echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer

  $ cat /proc/self/stack
  [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27
  [<ffffffff810394cc>] print_context_stack+0xfc/0x100
  [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27
  [<ffffffff8103891b>] dump_trace+0x12b/0x350
  [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27
  [<ffffffff810489a2>] save_stack_trace_tsk+0x22/0x40
  [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27
  [<ffffffff81311a89>] proc_pid_stack+0xb9/0x110
  [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27
  [<ffffffff813127c4>] proc_single_show+0x54/0x80
  [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27
  [<ffffffff812be088>] seq_read+0x108/0x3e0
  [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27
  [<ffffffff812923d7>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x140
  [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27
  [<ffffffff812929d9>] vfs_read+0x99/0x140
  [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

Enabling function graph tracing causes the stack trace to change in two
ways:

First, the real call addresses are confusingly interspersed with
'return_to_handler' addresses.  This issue will be fixed by the next
patch.

Second, the stack trace is offset by two frames, because the unwinder
skipped the first two frames and got out of sync with the ret_stack
index.  This patch fixes this issue.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a6d623e36f8d08f9a17bd74d804d201177a23afd.1471607358.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com


Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

parent 408fe5de

arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h

+2 −0

Original line number	Diff line number	Diff line
		@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
		#define ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS 1
		#endif

		#define HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR

		#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
		extern void mcount(void);
		extern atomic_t modifying_ftrace_code;

arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c

+1 −1

Original line number	Diff line number	Diff line
		@@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ void prepare_ftrace_return(unsigned long self_addr, unsigned long *parent,
		}

		if (ftrace_push_return_trace(old, self_addr, &trace.depth,
		frame_pointer, NULL) == -EBUSY) {
		frame_pointer, parent) == -EBUSY) {
		*parent = old;
		return;
		}

Admin message