mm/page_alloc: factor out setting of pcp->high and pcp->batch

"Problems" with the current code:

1: there is a lack of synchronization in setting ->high and ->batch in
   percpu_pagelist_fraction_sysctl_handler()

2: stop_machine() in zone_pcp_update() is unnecissary.

3: zone_pcp_update() does not consider the case where
   percpu_pagelist_fraction is non-zero

To fix:

1: add memory barriers, a safe ->batch value, an update side mutex when
   updating ->high and ->batch, and use ACCESS_ONCE() for ->batch users
   that expect a stable value.

2: avoid draining pages in zone_pcp_update(), rely upon the memory
   barriers added to fix #1

3: factor out quite a few functions, and then call the appropriate one.

Note that it results in a change to the behavior of zone_pcp_update(),
which is used by memory_hotplug.  I'm rather certain that I've diserned
(and preserved) the essential behavior (changing ->high and ->batch), and
only eliminated unneeded actions (draining the per cpu pages), but this
may not be the case.

Further note that the draining of pages that previously took place in
zone_pcp_update() occured after repeated draining when attempting to
offline a page, and after the offline has "succeeded".  It appears that
the draining was added to zone_pcp_update() to avoid refactoring
setup_pageset() into 2 funtions.

This patch:

Creates pageset_set_batch() for use in setup_pageset().
pageset_set_batch() imitates the functionality of
setup_pagelist_highmark(), but uses the boot time
(percpu_pagelist_fraction == 0) calculations for determining ->high based
on ->batch.

Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>