+208
−23
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Implement support for TYPE_EXISTS/TYPE_SIZE/TYPE_ID_LOCAL/TYPE_ID_REMOTE relocations. These are examples of type-based relocations, as opposed to field-based relocations supported already. The difference is that they are calculating relocation values based on the type itself, not a field within a struct/union. Type-based relos have slightly different semantics when matching local types to kernel target types, see comments in bpf_core_types_are_compat() for details. Their behavior on failure to find target type in kernel BTF also differs. Instead of "poisoning" relocatable instruction and failing load subsequently in kernel, they return 0 (which is rarely a valid return result, so user BPF code can use that to detect success/failure of the relocation and deal with it without extra "guarding" relocations). Also, it's always possible to check existence of the type in target kernel with TYPE_EXISTS relocation, similarly to a field-based FIELD_EXISTS. TYPE_ID_LOCAL relocation is a bit special in that it always succeeds (barring any libbpf/Clang bugs) and resolved to BTF ID using **local** BTF info of BPF program itself. Tests in subsequent patches demonstrate the usage and semantics of new relocations. Signed-off-by:Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by:
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200819194519.3375898-2-andriin@fb.com
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE