Commit 3adae0b4 authored Dec 13, 2019 by Janosch Frank Committed by Christian Borntraeger Feb 27, 2020

KVM: s390: protvirt: Mask PSW interrupt bits for interception 104 and 112



We're not allowed to inject interrupts on intercepts that leave the
guest state in an "in-between" state where the next SIE entry will do a
continuation, namely secure instruction interception (104) and secure
prefix interception (112).
As our PSW is just a copy of the real one that will be replaced on the
next exit, we can mask out the interrupt bits in the PSW to make sure
that we do not inject anything.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
[borntraeger@de.ibm.com: patch merging, splitting, fixing]
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

parent 7c36a3fc

arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c

+11 −0

Original line number	Diff line number	Diff line
		@@ -4093,6 +4093,7 @@ static int vcpu_post_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int exit_reason)
		return vcpu_post_run_fault_in_sie(vcpu);
		}

		#define PSW_INT_MASK (PSW_MASK_EXT \| PSW_MASK_IO \| PSW_MASK_MCHECK)
		static int __vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
		{
		int rc, exit_reason;
		@@ -4129,6 +4130,16 @@ static int __vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
		memcpy(vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs,
		sie_page->pv_grregs,
		sizeof(sie_page->pv_grregs));
		/*
		* We're not allowed to inject interrupts on intercepts
		* that leave the guest state in an "in-between" state
		* where the next SIE entry will do a continuation.
		* Fence interrupts in our "internal" PSW.
		*/
		if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptcode == ICPT_PV_INSTR \|\|
		vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptcode == ICPT_PV_PREF) {
		vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask &= ~PSW_INT_MASK;
		}
		}
		local_irq_disable();
		__enable_cpu_timer_accounting(vcpu);

Admin message