Commit 3a37b918 authored by Steven Rostedt (VMware)'s avatar Steven Rostedt (VMware)
Browse files

ftrace/documentation: Fix RST C code blocks

Some C code in the ftrace-users.rst document is missing RST C block
annotation, which has to be added.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201116173502.392a769c@canb.auug.org.au



Acked-by: default avatarJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Reported-by: default avatarStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
parent 76980f5f
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+6 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -116,6 +116,8 @@ called by a callback may also be traced, and call that same callback,
recursion protection must be used. There are two helper functions that
can help in this regard. If you start your code with:

.. code-block:: c

	int bit;

	bit = ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(ip, parent_ip);
@@ -124,6 +126,8 @@ can help in this regard. If you start your code with:

and end it with:

.. code-block:: c

	ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(bit);

The code in between will be safe to use, even if it ends up calling a
@@ -145,6 +149,8 @@ protection, it is best to make sure that RCU is "watching", otherwise
that data or critical section will not be protected as expected. In this
case add:

.. code-block:: c

	if (!rcu_is_watching())
		return;