+0
−3
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
There are redundant lines in allocate_data_block. In this function, we call refresh_sit_entry with old seg and old curseg. After that, we call locate_dirty_segment with old curseg. But, the new address is always allocated from old curseg and we call locate_dirty_segment with old curseg in refresh_sit_entry. So, we do not need to call locate_dirty_segment with old curseg again. We've discussed like below: Jaegeuk said: "When considering SSR, we need to take care of the following scenario. - old segno : X - new address : Z - old curseg : Y This means, a new block is supposed to be written to Z from X. And Z is newly allocated in the same path from Y. In that case, we should trigger locate_dirty_segment for Y, since it was a current_segment and can be dirty owing to SSR. But that was not included in the dirty list." Changman said: "We already choosed old curseg(Y) and then we allocate new address(Z) from old curseg(Y). After that we call refresh_sit_entry(old address, new address). In the funcation, we call locate_dirty_segment with old seg and old curseg. So calling locate_dirty_segment after refresh_sit_entry again is redundant." Jaegeuk said: "Right. The new address is always allocated from old_curseg." Reviewed-by:Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com> Signed-off-by:
Dongho Sim <dh.sim@samsung.com> Signed-off-by:
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE