Commit 2fb12a9b authored Feb 13, 2007 by Eric W. Biederman Committed by Andi Kleen Feb 13, 2007

[PATCH] x86-64: survive having no irq mapping for a vector



Occasionally the kernel has bugs that result in no irq being found for a
given cpu vector.  If we acknowledge the irq the system has a good chance
of continuing even though we dropped an irq message.  If we continue to
simply print a message and not acknowledge the irq the system is likely to
become non-responsive shortly there after.

AK: Fixed compilation for UP kernels

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: "Luigi Genoni" <luigi.genoni@pirelli.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

parent bcde1ebb

arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c

+9 −3

Original line number	Diff line number	Diff line
		@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
		#include <asm/uaccess.h>
		#include <asm/io_apic.h>
		#include <asm/idle.h>
		#include <asm/smp.h>

		atomic_t irq_err_count;

		@@ -120,9 +121,14 @@ asmlinkage unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)

		if (likely(irq < NR_IRQS))
		generic_handle_irq(irq);
		else if (printk_ratelimit())
		else {
		if (!disable_apic)
		ack_APIC_irq();

		if (printk_ratelimit())
		printk(KERN_EMERG "%s: %d.%d No irq handler for vector\n",
		__func__, smp_processor_id(), vector);
		}

		irq_exit();

Admin message