Commit 29dcb570 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson
Browse files

drm/i915: Move the hw semaphore initialisation from GEM to the engine



Since we are setting engine local values that are tied to the hardware,
move it out of i915_gem_init_seqno() into the intel_ring_init_seqno()
backend, next to where the other hw semaphore registers are written.

v2: Make the explanatory comment about always resetting the semaphores to
0 irrespective of the value of the reset seqno.

Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460010558-10705-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent d04bce48
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+2 −6
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -2468,7 +2468,7 @@ i915_gem_init_seqno(struct drm_device *dev, u32 seqno)
{
	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
	int ret, j;
	int ret;

	/* Carefully retire all requests without writing to the rings */
	for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv) {
@@ -2479,13 +2479,9 @@ i915_gem_init_seqno(struct drm_device *dev, u32 seqno)
	i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);

	/* Finally reset hw state */
	for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv) {
	for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv)
		intel_ring_init_seqno(engine, seqno);

		for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(engine->semaphore.sync_seqno); j++)
			engine->semaphore.sync_seqno[j] = 0;
	}

	return 0;
}

+11 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -2552,14 +2552,25 @@ void intel_ring_init_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 seqno)
{
	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(engine->dev);

	/* Our semaphore implementation is strictly monotonic (i.e. we proceed
	 * so long as the semaphore value in the register/page is greater
	 * than the sync value), so whenever we reset the seqno,
	 * so long as we reset the tracking semaphore value to 0, it will
	 * always be before the next request's seqno. If we don't reset
	 * the semaphore value, then when the seqno moves backwards all
	 * future waits will complete instantly (causing rendering corruption).
	 */
	if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen == 6 || INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen == 7) {
		I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_0(engine->mmio_base), 0);
		I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_1(engine->mmio_base), 0);
		if (HAS_VEBOX(dev_priv))
			I915_WRITE(RING_SYNC_2(engine->mmio_base), 0);
	}
	memset(engine->semaphore.sync_seqno, 0,
	       sizeof(engine->semaphore.sync_seqno));

	engine->set_seqno(engine, seqno);

	engine->hangcheck.seqno = seqno;
}