+12
−11
+15
−2
+26
−15
+1
−1
+1
−1
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
When adding a new remote attribute, we write the attribute to the new extent before the allocation transaction is committed. This means we cannot reuse busy extents as that violates crash consistency semantics. Hence we currently treat remote attribute extent allocation like userdata because it has the same overwrite ordering constraints as userdata. Unfortunately, this also allows the allocator to incorrectly apply extent size hints to the remote attribute extent allocation. This results in interesting failures, such as transaction block reservation overruns and in-memory inode attribute fork corruption. To fix this, we need to separate the busy extent reuse configuration from the userdata configuration. This changes the definition of XFS_BMAPI_METADATA slightly - it now means that allocation is metadata and reuse of busy extents is acceptible due to the metadata ordering semantics of the journal. If this flag is not set, it means the allocation is that has unordered data writeback, and hence busy extent reuse is not allowed. It no longer implies the allocation is for user data, just that the data write will not be strictly ordered. This matches the semantics for both user data and remote attribute block allocation. As such, This patch changes the "userdata" field to a "datatype" field, and adds a "no busy reuse" flag to the field. When we detect an unordered data extent allocation, we immediately set the no reuse flag. We then set the "user data" flags based on the inode fork we are allocating the extent to. Hence we only set userdata flags on data fork allocations now and consider attribute fork remote extents to be an unordered metadata extent. The result is that remote attribute extents now have the expected allocation semantics, and the data fork allocation behaviour is completely unchanged. It should be noted that there may be other ways to fix this (e.g. use ordered metadata buffers for the remote attribute extent data write) but they are more invasive and difficult to validate both from a design and implementation POV. Hence this patch takes the simple, obvious route to fixing the problem... Reported-and-tested-by:Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by:
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE