Commit 26208d87 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson
Browse files

drm/i915/gt: Fix hold/unhold recursion

In eliminating the recursion from walking the tree of signalers/waiters
for processing the hold/unhold operations, a crucial error crept in
where we looked at the parent request and not the list element when
processing the list.

Brown paper bag, much?

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1166


Fixes: 32ff621f ("drm/i915/gt: Allow temporary suspension of inflight requests")
Fixes: 74831738 ("drm/i915/execlists: Offline error capture")
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200209131922.180287-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent 48d7fb18
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+8 −5
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -2374,10 +2374,10 @@ static void __execlists_hold(struct i915_request *rq)
		if (i915_request_is_active(rq))
			__i915_request_unsubmit(rq);

		RQ_TRACE(rq, "on hold\n");
		clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
		list_move_tail(&rq->sched.link, &rq->engine->active.hold);
		i915_request_set_hold(rq);
		RQ_TRACE(rq, "on hold\n");

		for_each_waiter(p, rq) {
			struct i915_request *w =
@@ -2393,7 +2393,7 @@ static void __execlists_hold(struct i915_request *rq)
			if (i915_request_completed(w))
				continue;

			if (i915_request_on_hold(rq))
			if (i915_request_on_hold(w))
				continue;

			list_move_tail(&w->sched.link, &list);
@@ -2451,6 +2451,7 @@ static bool execlists_hold(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_on_hold(rq));
	GEM_BUG_ON(rq->engine != engine);
	__execlists_hold(rq);
	GEM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&engine->active.hold));

unlock:
	spin_unlock_irq(&engine->active.lock);
@@ -2486,6 +2487,8 @@ static void __execlists_unhold(struct i915_request *rq)
	do {
		struct i915_dependency *p;

		RQ_TRACE(rq, "hold release\n");

		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_on_hold(rq));
		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_signaled(&rq->submit));

@@ -2494,7 +2497,6 @@ static void __execlists_unhold(struct i915_request *rq)
			       i915_sched_lookup_priolist(rq->engine,
							  rq_prio(rq)));
		set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
		RQ_TRACE(rq, "hold release\n");

		/* Also release any children on this engine that are ready */
		for_each_waiter(p, rq) {
@@ -2504,11 +2506,11 @@ static void __execlists_unhold(struct i915_request *rq)
			if (w->engine != rq->engine)
				continue;

			if (!i915_request_on_hold(rq))
			if (!i915_request_on_hold(w))
				continue;

			/* Check that no other parents are also on hold */
			if (hold_request(rq))
			if (hold_request(w))
				continue;

			list_move_tail(&w->sched.link, &list);
@@ -2806,6 +2808,7 @@ static void execlists_submit_request(struct i915_request *request)
	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->active.lock, flags);

	if (unlikely(ancestor_on_hold(engine, request))) {
		RQ_TRACE(request, "ancestor on hold\n");
		list_add_tail(&request->sched.link, &engine->active.hold);
		i915_request_set_hold(request);
	} else {