+78
−0
+7
−0
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
This adds logic to the MMC core to set VQMMC. This is expected to be called by MMC drivers like dw_mmc as part of (or instead of) their start_signal_voltage_switch() callback. A few notes: * When setting the signal voltage to 3.3V we do our best to make VQMMC and VMMC match. It's been reported that this makes some old cards happy since they were tested back in the day before UHS when VQMMC and VMMC were provided by the same regulator. A nice side effect of this is that we don't end up on the hairy edge of VQMMC (2.7V), which some EEs claim is a little too close to the minimum for comfort. This is done in two steps. At first we try to find a VQMMC within a 0.3V tolerance of VMMC and if this is not supported by the supplying regulator we try to find a suitable voltage within the whole 2.7V-3.6V area of the spec. * The two step approach is currently necessary, as the used regulator_set_voltage_triplet(min, target, max) uses a simple implementation that just tries two basic steps: regulator_set_voltage(target, max); regulator_set_voltage(min, target); So with only one step with 2.7-3.6V borders, if a suitable voltage is a bit below VMMC, we would directly get the lowest 2.7V which some boards (like Rockchips) don't like at all. * When setting the signal voltage to 1.8V or 1.2V we aim for that specific voltage instead of picking the lowest one in the range. * We very purposely don't print errors in mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(). There are cases where the MMC core will try several different voltages and we don't want to pollute the logs. Signed-off-by:Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by:
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Signed-off-by:
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE