+56
−2
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
As it stands, a large fallocate() on tmpfs is liable to fill memory with pages, freed on failure except when they run into swap, at which point they become fixed into the file despite the failure. That feels quite wrong, to be consuming resources precisely when they're in short supply. Go the other way instead: shmem_fallocate() indicate the range it has fallocated to shmem_writepage(), keeping count of pages it's allocating; shmem_writepage() reactivate instead of swapping out pages fallocated by this syscall (but happily swap out those from earlier occasions), keeping count; shmem_fallocate() compare counts and give up once the reactivated pages have started to coming back to writepage (approximately: some zones would in fact recycle faster than others). This is a little unusual, but works well: although we could consider the failure to swap as a bug, and fix it later with SWAP_MAP_FALLOC handling added in swapfile.c and memcontrol.c, I doubt that we shall ever want to. (If there's no swap, an over-large fallocate() on tmpfs is limited in the same way as writing: stopped by rlimit, or by tmpfs mount size if that was set sensibly, or by __vm_enough_memory() heuristics if OVERCOMMIT_GUESS or OVERCOMMIT_NEVER. If OVERCOMMIT_ALWAYS, then it is liable to OOM-kill others as writing would, but stops and frees if interrupted.) Now that everything is freed on failure, we can then skip updating ctime. Signed-off-by:Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> Cc: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE