+4
−1
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Commit af46800b ("ASoC: Implement mux control sharing") introduced function dapm_is_shared_kcontrol. When this function returns true, the naming of DAPM controls is derived from the kcontrol_new. Otherwise, the name comes from the widget (and possibly a widget's naming prefix). A bug in the implementation of dapm_is_shared_kcontrol made it return 1 in all cases. Hence, that commit caused a change in control naming for all controls instead of just shared controls. Specifically, a control is always considered shared because it is always compared against itself. Solve this by never comparing against the widget containing the control being created. Equally, controls should never be shared between DAPM contexts; when the same codec is instantiated multiple times, the same kcontrol_new will be used. However, the control should no be shared between the multiple instances. I tested that with the Tegra WM8903 driver: * Shared is now mostly 0 as expected, and sometimes 1. * The expected controls are still generated after this change. However, I don't have any systems that have a widget/control naming prefix, so I can't test that aspect. Thanks for Jarkko Nikula for pointing out how to fix this. Reported-by:Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com> Tested-by:
Jarkko Nikula <jhnikula@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Acked-by:
Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com> Signed-off-by:
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE