+16
−1
+6
−2
+5
−2
+33
−2
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
When an NFSv4 client performs a mount operation, it first mounts the NFSv4 root and then does path walk to the exported path and performs a submount on that, cloning the security mount options from the root's superblock to the submount's superblock in the process. Unless the NFS server has an explicit fsid=0 export with the "security_label" option, the NFSv4 root superblock will not have SBLABEL_MNT set, and neither will the submount superblock after cloning the security mount options. As a result, setxattr's of security labels over NFSv4.2 will fail. In a similar fashion, NFSv4.2 mounts mounted with the context= mount option will not show the correct labels because the nfs_server->caps flags of the cloned superblock will still have NFS_CAP_SECURITY_LABEL set. Allowing the NFSv4 client to enable or disable SECURITY_LSM_NATIVE_LABELS behavior will ensure that the SBLABEL_MNT flag has the correct value when the client traverses from an exported path without the "security_label" option to one with the "security_label" option and vice versa. Similarly, checking to see if SECURITY_LSM_NATIVE_LABELS is set upon return from security_sb_clone_mnt_opts() and clearing NFS_CAP_SECURITY_LABEL if necessary will allow the correct labels to be displayed for NFSv4.2 mounts mounted with the context= mount option. Resolves: https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux-kernel/issues/35 Signed-off-by:Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> Tested-by:
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> Signed-off-by:
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE