Commit 0b0120d4 authored by Lionel Landwerlin's avatar Lionel Landwerlin
Browse files

drm/i915/perf: always consider holding preemption a privileged op



The ordering of the checks in the existing code can lead to holding
preemption not being considered as privileged op.

Signed-off-by: default avatarLionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Fixes: 9cd20ef7 ("drm/i915/perf: allow holding preemption on filtered ctx")
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191111095308.2550-1-lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com
parent baea9ffe
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+10 −10
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -3312,15 +3312,6 @@ i915_perf_open_ioctl_locked(struct i915_perf *perf,
		}
	}

	if (props->hold_preemption) {
		if (!props->single_context) {
			DRM_DEBUG("preemption disable with no context\n");
			ret = -EINVAL;
			goto err;
		}
		privileged_op = true;
	}

	/*
	 * On Haswell the OA unit supports clock gating off for a specific
	 * context and in this mode there's no visibility of metrics for the
@@ -3340,12 +3331,21 @@ i915_perf_open_ioctl_locked(struct i915_perf *perf,
	 * doesn't request global stream access (i.e. query based sampling
	 * using MI_RECORD_PERF_COUNT.
	 */
	if (IS_HASWELL(perf->i915) && specific_ctx && !props->hold_preemption)
	if (IS_HASWELL(perf->i915) && specific_ctx)
		privileged_op = false;
	else if (IS_GEN(perf->i915, 12) && specific_ctx &&
		 (props->sample_flags & SAMPLE_OA_REPORT) == 0)
		privileged_op = false;

	if (props->hold_preemption) {
		if (!props->single_context) {
			DRM_DEBUG("preemption disable with no context\n");
			ret = -EINVAL;
			goto err;
		}
		privileged_op = true;
	}

	/* Similar to perf's kernel.perf_paranoid_cpu sysctl option
	 * we check a dev.i915.perf_stream_paranoid sysctl option
	 * to determine if it's ok to access system wide OA counters