+0
−3
+2
−0
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
commit afdb09c7 ("security: bpf: Add LSM hooks for bpf object related syscall") included linux/bpf.h in linux/security.h. As a result, bpf programs including bpf_helpers.h and some other header that ends up pulling in also security.h, such as several examples under samples/bpf, fail to compile because bpf_tail_call and bpf_get_stackid are now "redefined as different kind of symbol". >From bpf.h: u64 bpf_tail_call(u64 ctx, u64 r2, u64 index, u64 r4, u64 r5); u64 bpf_get_stackid(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5); Whereas in bpf_helpers.h they are: static void (*bpf_tail_call)(void *ctx, void *map, int index); static int (*bpf_get_stackid)(void *ctx, void *map, int flags); Fix this by removing the unused declaration of bpf_tail_call and moving the declaration of bpf_get_stackid in bpf_trace.c, which is the only place where it's needed. Signed-off-by:Gianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE