+42
−34
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Use of atomics does not make these statements robust:
atomic_inc(&chip->opencount);
if (atomic_read(&chip->opencount) > 1 && chip->rate_set)
chip->can_set_rate=0;
and
if (atomic_read(&chip->opencount)) {
if (chip->opencount) {
changed = -EAGAIN;
} else {
changed = set_digital_mode(chip, dmode);
It would be necessary to atomically increment or decrement the value
and use the returned result. And yet we still need to prevent other
threads making use of "can_set_rate" while we set it.
However in all but one case the atomic is misleading as they are already
running with "mode_mutex" held.
Decisions are made on mode setting are often intrinsically connected
to "opencount" because some operations are not permitted unless
there is sole ownership.
So instead simplify this, and use "mode_mutex" as a lock for all reference
counting and mode setting.
Signed-off-by:
Mark Hills <mark@xwax.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200708101848.3457-2-mark@xwax.org
Signed-off-by:
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE