模块 1:人工智能技术应用引发的挑战(6学时)
人工智能是一项正在发展的技术,其固有的技术缺陷不免引发人们对技术安全和国际稳定的担忧。那么,什么是人工智能
技术?它的发展和应用给人类社会带来了哪些冲击,以及何种程度的挑战?
模块 2:大国人工智能“军备竞赛”带来的安全风险(8学时)
围绕着人工智能产业发展,世界主要国家做出了何种部署?其中尤为引人注目的是中美人工智能竞赛。对于这场大国竞
赛,有观点认为它是一场围绕领导权的输死博弈,还有观点则认为其中存在着共同合作来减缓安全困境的空间。那么,我
们该如何理解当前中美在人工智能领域的竞赛?
模块 3:全面禁止人工智能军事化可行吗?(6学时)
国际组织和知识界以何种叙事说服受众接受其主张?人工智能技术的军事应用是否真的违背了国际法基本准则?全面禁止
人工智能军事化缘何遭遇挑战?
模块 4:借鉴国际军控经验的治理路径(6学时)
从国家限制军备竞赛的经验来看,其包括军事自我克制,维持攻防平衡,签订双边或多边国际条约等等。这些国际军控途
径的逻辑是什么?在人工智能安全治理中,哪些方式可能更容易被实现?
模块 5:人工智能全球治理和中国的选择(6学时)
围绕着人工智能全球治理,有哪些重要的治理平台,达成了何种共识?不同国家在人工智能治理方面提出了那些方案,具
有怎样的特色呢?
Module 1: Challenges caused by the application of artificial intelligence technology(6 hours)
Artificial intelligence is a developing technology, and its inherent technical defects inevitably cause people to worry
about technological security and international stability. So, what is artificial intelligence technology? What impact has its
development and application brought to human society, and what degree of challenges?
Module 2: Security risks brought by the "arms race" of artificial intelligence in major powers(8 hours)
Regarding the development of the artificial intelligence industry, what deployments have major countries in the world
made? One of the most notable is the China-US artificial intelligence competition. Regarding this great power
competition, some believe that it is a loss-and-death game around leadership, while others believe that there is room for
joint cooperation to alleviate the security dilemma. So, how do we understand the current Sino-US competition in the
field of artificial intelligence?
Module 3: Is a total ban on the militarization of artificial intelligence feasible? (6 hours)
What narratives do international organizations and intellectuals use to persuade the audience to accept their claims?
Does the military application of artificial intelligence technology really violate the basic norms of international law? Why
does the total ban on the militarization of artificial intelligence encounter challenges?
Module 4: A governance path that draws on the experience of international arms control(6 hours)
Judging from the country’s experience in restricting the arms race, it includes military self-restraint, maintaining a
balance between offense and defense, signing bilateral or multilateral international treaties, and so on. What is the logic
of these international arms control approaches? In artificial intelligence security governance, which methods may be
easier to implement?
Module 5: Global governance of artificial intelligence and China's choice(6 hours)
Regarding the global governance of artificial intelligence, what are the important governance platforms and what
consensus has been reached? What are the characteristics of those solutions proposed by different countries in terms
of artificial intelligence governance?